When stealing, do you take into consideration who eats the cost of the stolen merchandise?
For example, there are essentially three types of stores: independent, franchise, and corporate.
At independent stores, the cost goes right to the owner/manager.
Franchise stores, (7-Eleven for example), share profit with corporate HQ, typically about an 80/20 split. So, stealing from a franchise does in fact reduce profits of the corporation, but the owner/manager of that specific location is the only one who truly incurs the loss, as they're the one paying to replace the stolen merchandise.
Corporate owned and operated stores, (Walmart, K-Mart, Target, Best Buy, Macys, most supermarkets and department stores really), the cost is typically taken as a direct corporate loss.
But when these companies take big enough losses, to keep from going under who do they then try to pass it on to? Workers? Suppliers? Consumers? Tax-Payers?
Yeah, I know we don't really make much if any impact on corporate and franchise profits, but I was just wondering if I'm the only who thinks of these things...
Or do you guys steal indiscriminately and I just overthink stuff?